Dec 22, 2013

¦øÞÃí ¨ çÆÕÏÞÈß æ~ÞdÌ·æÁ? 

çÆÕÏÞÈß æ~ÞdÌ·æÁ



¦ÕVJß‚í ¥ÕV ®æK ÕßÜBáÕ‚á. ÕßÕØídÄÏÞAß ÉøßçÖÞÇß‚á. ÖøàøJßæXù ÕßÕßÇ ÍÞ·B{ßW ÈßKí µÞÕßxß æØV‚ßÈÞÏß dØÕæοáJá. dµßÎßÈÜáµZAᢠÎÏAáÎøáKáÉçÏÞ·ßAáKÕVAáæÎÞM¢ ¥ÕæøæK ¼ÏßÏßÜßÜÞAß. ÉÜÄÕà ¾ÞX æÉÞGßAøEá çÉÞÏß. ¥çÎøßAÏßW ¥ùØíxßÜÞÏ §LcX ÈÏÄdL ©çÆcÞ·ØíÅ çÆÕÏÞÈß æ~ÞdÌ·æÁ ØáÙãJáAZAÏ‚ æÎÏßÜßæÜ Õøßµ{ÞÃßÄí.

¦øÞÃí ¨ çÆÕÏÞÈß, ²øÞÝíºAÞÜÎÞÏß ÎÞÇcÎB{ßW ÈßùEá ÈßWAáK Îá~¢. ´çÆcÞ·ßµÎÞÏß ÉùEÞW §LcX çµÞYØáçÜxí ¼ÈùW µÞøcÞÜÏJßæÜ æÁÉcâGß çµÞYØW ¼ÈùW çÆÕÏÞÈß æ~ÞdÌ·æÁ. §çMÞZ Ïá®X Îß×ÈßæÜ §LcÏáæ¿ ØíÅßø¢ ØÎßÄßÏßæÜ ¥¢·¢.

ÕcµíÄßµ{áæ¿ ØbµÞøcÄæÏÏᢠ¥ÍßÎÞÈæJÏᢠÎÞÈßAÞæÄÏáU ÉøßçÖÞÇÈ çºÞÆc¢ 溇æMç¿IÄá ÄæKÏçˆ? ÎÈá×cÞÕµÞÖ Ü¢¸ÈJßÈáU Ößf ÎæxÞøá ÎÈá×cÞÕµÞÖ Ü¢¸ÈÎÞçÃÞ? çºÞÆcBZ ©ÏøáçOÞZ §aVæÈxßW çÆÕÏÞÈßÏáæ¿ ÕßÕøBZAÞÏß Äßø‚ßÜáµZ ¯ùáµÏÞÃí.

çÆÕÏÞÈß æ~ÞdÌ·æÁ, ÎÙÞøÞ×íd¿ çµÁùßæÜ °®®Øí ©çÆcÞ·ØíÅÈÞÏßøáK ©J¢ æ~ÞdÌ·æÁÏáæ¿ ÎµZ. æµÞ‚á çÆÕÏÞÈßæÏ çÁÞµí¿V çÆÕÏÞÈßÏÞAßÏÄᢠÈÏÄdL ©çÆcÞ·ØíÅÏÞAßÏÄᢠÎá¢èÌ È·ø¢.

æÎÁßAW dÉË×X ©çÉfß‚í ¥ÕZ çËÞùßX ØVÕàØí µVNçÎ~ÜÏÞÏß Øbàµøß‚Äí ¥NÞÕX ¥¼ßÄí ®¢ æ·ÞIÞÈæÏ ÎÞÄãµÏÞAßÏÞÃí. 1985 ÌÞ‚ßæÜ æ®®Ëí®Øí ³ËßØùÞÏßøáKá ¥¼ßÄí. 1999 W çÆÕÏÞÈß ºßøµÞÜ ØbÉíÈ¢ ÉâVJßÏÞAß §LcX çËÞùßX ØVÕàØí ©çÆcÞ·ØíÅÏÞÏß. §¢±à×í, Ùßwß, ¼VÎX, ÎùÞJß ®Kà ÍÞ×µZ ÕßÆ·íÇÎÞÏß èµµÞøc¢ 溇áK çÆÕÏÞÈß ÕßÕÞÙ¢ æºÏíÄßøßAáKÄí ²øá dÉËØæùÏÞÃí. ¦ùᢠÎâKᢠÕÏTáU øIí æÉYµáGßµ{ᢠ§ÕVAáIí.

ÏÞdÄÏᢠÕÞÏÈÏᢠçÏÞ·Ïᢠ§×í¿æM¿áK çÆÕÏÞÈßÏáæ¿ ÎæxÞøá ÄÞWÉøc¢ ØÞÎâÙßµçØÕÈÎÞÃí. ÆÜßÄøáæ¿ ©KÎÈJßÈᢠØÞÎâÙßµ ØÎÄbJßÈᢠçÕIß ¥ÕV ²çGæù µÞøcBZ æºÏíÄá. ¦VGí ®ÁcáçA×æÈAáùß‚áU çÜÞµJßæXù ÎçÈÞÍÞÕ¢ ¾ÞX ÎÞxßæÏ¿áAᢠ®KÞÃí ¥¿áJßæ¿ ¥ÕV ¿bßxùßW µáùß‚Äí.

ØÙdÉÕVJµæøçMÞæÜ çØÞ×cW æÈxí ÕVAß¹í èØxáµ{ßW ؼàÕÎæˆCßÜᢠ¥çÎøßAX dÉØßÁXùí ÌùÞµí ²ÌÞÎ, §LcX dÉÇÞÈÎdLß ÎXçÎÞÙX ØßBí, Ïá®ØßæÜ §LcX ¥¢ÌÞØßÁV ÈßøáÉÎ ùÞÕá, æ¿ÜßçµÞ¢ ·áøá ØÞ¢ ÉßçdÄÞÆ ®KßÕøáæ¿ ¿bßxV çËÞç{ÞÕùÞÃí çÆÕÏÞÈß. µçÈÁßÏX ¥çÎøßAX ¥ÍßçÈÄÞA{ÞÏ æ¼ÏߢØí Ïâ¼ßX, ¼ß¢ µcÞøß ®KßÕøáæ¿ µ¿áJ ¦øÞǵÏá¢.

ÕàGáç¼ÞÜßAÞøßÏáæ¿ ÕàØ Ø¢Ìtß‚á æÄxÞÏ ÕßÕøBZ ÈWµßæÏKÞçøÞÉß‚ÞÃí çÆÕÏÞÈßæÏ ¥ùØíxí æºÏíÄÄí.  ÕàGáçÕÜAÞøßçÏÞ¿í ÎÈá×cÞÕµÞÖ Ü¢¸È¢ È¿JßæÏKí ¦çøÞÉß‚í  ¥çÎøßAX ÈßÏÎÕßÆ·íÇV ÈÏÄdLdÉÄßÈßÇßçÏÞ¿í µÞGßÏ dÉÕãJßµZ ÎÈá×cÞÕµÞÖ Ü¢¸È¢ ÄæKÏçˆ ®K çºÞÆcJßÈí ¯æÄÞøá µáxÕÞ{ßçÏ޿ᢠØbàµøßAáK ÈßÏÎÈ¿É¿ßµZ ÎÞdÄçÎ ÄBZ Øbàµøß‚áUá ®KÞÃí ¥çÎøßAÏáæ¿ ÈßÜÉÞ¿í. çÆÕÏÞÈßæÏ §Lc °µcøÞ×íd¿ Ø¢¸¿ÈÏßæÜ ÄB{áæ¿ ØíÅßø¢ Îß×ÈßçÜAá ÎÞxßÏßøáKá. Ïá®Øí Íøõ⿢ ®¿áçJAÞÕáK µâ¿áÄW È¿É¿ßµ{ßWÈßKá øfßAÞÈᢠÉâVà ÈÏÄdLØáøf ©ùMÞAÞÈáÎÞÃßÄí. ¯xÕᢠÉáÄßÏ ÕßÕø¢ ¥ÈáØøß‚í ÈcâçÏÞVAßW §LcÏáæ¿ æÁÉcâGß çµÞYØW ¼ÈùÜÞÏ çÆÕÏÞÈß æ~ÞdÌ·æÁæÏ ¥ùØíxí æºÏíÄí µØíxÁßÏßW ¥ÉÎÞÈß‚ Ø¢ÍÕJßW Ïá®Øí ç¶Æ¢ dɵ¿ßMß‚ßGáIí.


kകടപ്പാട്: മനോരമ ഓണ്‍ലൈന്‍ 

Dec 16, 2013

'The riches belong to nobody, certainly not to our family'  



Uthradam Thirunal Marthanda Varma, the former King of Tranvancore: (March 22,1922 - 16 Dec, 2013)

The head of a former royal family renounced any personal claim to billions of dollars' worth of ancient treasure discovered in a temple in Thiruvanantharam, the kingdom his ancestors once ruled. Padma Rao Sundarji speaks to Uthradam Thirunal Marthanda Varma, the former King of Tranvancore.

PRS: What is your family's connection with the Padmanabhaswamy temple?
Varma: We are the Cheras, one of the four erstwhile royal families of South India and have a long and dynastic family tree. By 1750 Travancore had become rich and big. So my ancestor, the then king, made a unique spiritual and historical contribution. He decided to surrender all his riches to the temple - Padmanabhaswamy is also our family deity. He said our family would look after that wealth, the temple and the kingdom forever. But he did want the ego that comes with possessing it. He was influenced by Emperor Ashoka's catharsis in the killing fields of Kalinga. So he declared our family to be Padmanabha's 'dasas', devotees. A servant can resign his job, but a dasa can do so only when he dies.

PRS: You are one of the wealthiest families in India and yet, you live in a spartan way, unlike many other ex-royals. Why?
Varma: I have to go back a bit in time, to explain why. Everybody thinks that we Indians first rose against British colonial rule in 1857. Wrong. In 1741, Travancore was the only Asian power to defeat the Dutch when they arrived here. After the battle, all the Dutch soldiers kneeled before my ancestors. One Dutchman, Benedictus Eustachius, even joined our army. We called him the Great Kapitan. Later, I learned that he was [US president] Franklin Roosevelt's ancestor when the latter's grandson came to look at our historical records.
Then in 1839, almost two decades before the mutiny, we rose against the British. Our punishment was severe. They disbanded our police and army of 50,000, transferred our capital to Kollam, dumped two British regiments on us, and ordered us to pay for their upkeep. Thomas Munroe named himself Diwan of Travancore. When our spirit still did not flag, they brought in missionaries. But we did not get gobbled up by Western thought. We travel abroad occasionally, but it has not affected or changed our simple way of life. Why am I telling you this? So that you get an idea of how much our life has revolved around our faith, despite so many outside influences and kept us going.

PRS: How do you feel about what is happening around the temple right now - its cellars being opened up, your donations being discussed around the world, the criticism, the furore?
Varma: Sorry, I cannot comment on what is happening there - the matter is sub-judice. But this much I will say. I have no problem with the inventory and additional security being provided by the state to the temple. But please don't remove those objects from the temple. They belong to nobody, certainly not to our family. They belong to god and our law permits that. All these debates swirling around the riches is unfortunate. That's all I can say - I have to listen to my doctor, lawyer and auditor. Our family has been donating objects to the temple for centuries. As chief patron of the temple, I go there every day. If I miss a day, I am fined Rs. 166.35 - an old Travancore tradition.

PRS: But you cannot deny that such wealth could be put to better use for the poor.
Varma
: We Indians are more educated now. But this reaction to donations inside a temple is anything but progressive. We are slowly losing our Indian identity. Money has become everything. But I am not surprised. I would rather be philosophical than disillusioned because I can't change the world.

PRS: Then there is the rationalist argument that this is blind faith. 
Varma: Please think of England's Henry VIII in the late 1500s. He had two passions. Wives and money. So he pillaged churches. Finally, he ran into a problem because he wanted a divorce from Catherine of Aragon. The church refused, because she was a zealous Spanish Catholic. His cardinal advised him to invent his own church. So he did that - just to get a divorce. Is that rational?
It is rather difficult to explain our faith to the new world where people have none anymore. When selfishness grows, everything you do seems right, and everything others do seems wrong. It's all about what do I get, not about what do I do. I like the memory of my trip to a game reserve South Africa. After seeing many wild animals, I asked the guide which was the most rapacious and fearsome. He showed me a mirror.

PRS: What is your source of income? What does your family live off ?
Varma
: We have travel and hotel businesses. I am chairman of a former British company that exports various items from Kerala - but no, not pepper to Buckingham Palace, as reported. We also run seven trusts.  We spend R5-8 lakh a year on education, health and housing for the poor. We pay good salaries. And the family itself contributes money every month. No government has acknowledged our work but that is all right. We do it because we want to do it.

PRS: Gold statues studded with rubies and diamonds, saphhires, gold coins of the Napoleonic era and the East India Company. Is all that true?
Varma
: I have never been inside those cellars. Our philosophy has always been not to look at such objects and get tempted. But of course I know what is inside them.

PRS: Are the younger members of your family angrier than you about the heated public debate?
Varma: I am the most hot-blooded in this family but on this matter, we all feel the same. I was a soldier - a colonel for 15 years in the Madras Regiment. I would like to ask those criticizing us for donating these objects: why are they bothered about what someone else has done? What are they doing in the name of faith themselves ? Why the hot gossip over a donation to God?

PRS: At 90, you don't even use a walking stick. What is your daily routine ?
Varma: We have all been brought up very strictly and frugally. My day starts at 4 am with yoga. I only drink milk, I am a vegetarian and a teetotaler. I read the Vedas everyday. I go the temple for a ten-minute private audience with the deity every morning. After that, I indulge in one of my hobbies - "media surgery." I read the newspapers and clip articles over breakfast. I have a collection of the past 30 years. I will give those to the Trust because my children may not be interested. People come to meet me, they invite me to inaugurate functions. I speak extempore. I go from vertical to horizontal for about 20 minutes in the afternoon. I am in bed by 945. I have always slept well. Since there is nothing on my conscience, sleep comes swiftly.

PRS: Are you now thinking of insuring those treasures, now that the whole world is talking about them, or are they already insured ?
Varma: (laughs) I am least worried that they will be stolen. If that happens, then it was the Lord's will.

PRS: Among your ancestors were famous Carnatic musician Swati Thirunal and painter Raja Ravi Varma. What are your passions?
Varma: Those two ancestors gave music and art divinity and humanity respectively. That continues. I love art. I once saw a piece of exquisite china in Venice. It was a girl on a swing with the sand looking worn just where her feet touched the ground each time. It cost 100 pounds, I could only afford 40, as foreign exchange was limited those days. So I went away. The dealer called me back and gave it to me. He said he could tell that I was not one of those who ordered 200 pieces of one kind, that I valued minute details.

PRS: Kerala has been a Communist bastion for more than 50 years. Don't you find it peculiar that people here still flurry around you, they respect you, they still call you Your Highness.
Varma: Yes, that is quite amazing because I am a simple man, I don't expect it at all. At religious gatherings in Haridwar where one of my two gurus lives, I always sit in the last row and am always dressed like this - mundu and bush-shirt. People who don't know me come looking for the Raja of the South. When I raise my hand, they don't believe me.

PRS: How wealthy is your family, compared to the other - and internationally more famous - royals of Rajasthan and elsewhere?
Varma
: That is a mere technicality and has never been relevant to me. But I'll tell you a story which will give you an idea. There used to be a British gun salute for the princely states of India: 21, the highest for the richest ruler, 11 for the poorest. When Tranvancore refused to contribute soldiers to the British Army in World War I, our slipped from 21 to 19.

PRS: Who is your heir?
Varma
: We have a matriarchal system of inheritance. I have a daughter and a son but it is my sister's son who will be king after me. I remember a European lady visiting us. I explained this complicated law of succession to her. When she went back, she told her friends that she had not understood a word, but only knew that whatever it was, it was good for women. Kerala is slowly turning patriarchal again. That is not good. Overall in our country, we treat women as second-class citizens. When you look at a man, you are looking at a human being, when you look at a woman, you are looking at a family.

PRS: What is the feeling you get, when you spend those ten minutes at the Padmanabha shrine ? The daily communion between ruler and master, as you put it ?
Varma
: Gooseflesh. Everything is surrendered. It is a great, elating feeling. My hair stands on end with joy. Each and every time.
(Padma Rao Sundarji is South Asia bureau chief of Der Spiegel)

Dec 14, 2013

Nine Beliefs of Hinduism


Our beliefs determine our thoughts and attitudes about life, which in turn direct our actions. By our actions, we create our destiny. Beliefs about sacred matters--God, soul and cosmos--are essential to one's approach to life. Hindus believe many diverse things, but there are a few bedrock concepts on which most Hindus concur. The following nine beliefs, though not exhaustive, offer a simple summary of Hindu spirituality.
  1. Hindus believe in a one, all-pervasive Supreme Being who is both immanent and transcendent, both Creator and Unmanifest Reality.
  2. Hindus believe in the divinity of the four Vedas, the world's most ancient scripture, and venerate the Agamas as equally revealed. These primordial hymns are God's word and the bedrock of Sanatana Dharma, the eternal religion.
  3. Hindus believe that the universe undergoes endless cycles of creation, preservation and dissolution.
  4. Hindus believe in karma, the law of cause and effect by which each individual creates his own destiny by his thoughts, words and deeds.
  5. Hindus believe that the soul reincarnates, evolving through many births until all karmas have been resolved, and moksha, liberation from the cycle of rebirth, is attained. Not a single soul will be deprived of this destiny.
  6. Hindus believe that divine beings exist in unseen worlds and that temple worship, rituals, sacraments and personal devotionals create a communion with these devas and Gods.
  7. Hindus believe that an enlightened master, or satguru, is essential to know the Transcendent Absolute, as are personal discipline, good conduct, purification, pilgrimage, self-inquiry, meditation and surrender in God.
  8. Hindus believe that all life is sacred, to be loved and revered, and therefore practice ahimsa, noninjury, in thought, word and deed.
  9. Hindus believe that no religion teaches the only way to salvation above all others, but that all genuine paths are facets of God's Light, deserving tolerance and understanding.

MBA student sent to jail for 7 years for raping live-in partner


An MBA student convicted of raping his live-in partner several times after promising to marry her was on Friday sentenced to seven years in jail by a Delhi court.

Additional Sessions Judge Yogesh Khanna handed down the jail term to 31-year-old Hari Mohan Sharma after holding him guilty of ravishing an LL.B student.

"Considering the fact and circumstances, the nature of offence involved, I sentence convict Hari Mohan Sharma for the offence punishable under section 376 (rape) of IPC to rigorous imprisonment for seven years..," the court said and imposed Rs 5,000 as costs on the convict.

The judge recommended that "appropriate compensation, under section 357-A CrPC, be awarded to the prosecutrix and hence, a copy of this order be sent to the Secretary, Delhi Legal Service Authority, New Delhi, for deciding the quantum of compensation to be awarded to her under the scheme referred to in sub section 1 of section 357-A CrPC." 

CrPC was amended in 2008 on the recommendations of the Law Commission and Section 357A was introduced under which the court is empowered to direct the State to pay compensation to the victim. 

Sharma, a resident of Uttar Pradesh, was arrested and later faced trial in the case lodged by his partner in which she alleged he had raped her several times between December 2010 and January 2011 on the pretext of marrying her. 

The police said the girl had lodged a complaint in August 2011 when she became pregnant and Sharma had refused to marry her, saying his parents are against their affair. 

Sharma had denied the rape allegation against him during the trial and said he has been falsely implicated. 

The court, however, had brushed aside Sharma's plea and said a live-in relationship is not merely residing together, but it is about the commitment to be with the loved one in future as well. 

Observing that the girl was forced to abort the foetus, the court had said while convicting the man that "concept of live in relationship does not mean merely residing together, rather, it means to live in a commitment or in a relation of being together in future. 

"In our society, when a woman enters into this kind of relationship, she has in her mind only a marriage in future. However, when such relationship ends abruptly, it means a lot to the woman," it had said. 

The court had said, "The intention of the accused, right from the beginning, was never honest and he kept on promising her that he would marry her." 

It had also said the accused very well knew that his father would be against the love marriage and would not pay his fee for education but even then he continued "misusing" the girl till she became pregnant. 
OXEN RACE @ KERALA

BREATHTAKING ACTS



Nov 28, 2013

Drink coffee for a healthy heart...


A cup of coffee may keep your heart healthy by improving blood flow, says a study.

A study on 27 healthy adults showed for the first time that drinking a cup of caffeinated coffee significantly improved blood flow in a finger, which is a measure of how well the inner lining of the body's smaller blood vessels work.

The research was presented at the American Heart Association's Scientific Sessions 2013.

Specifically, participants who drank a cup of caffeinated coffee had a 30 percent increase in blood flow over a 75-minute period compared to those who drank decaffeinated coffee.

'This gives us a clue about how coffee may help improve cardiovascular health,' said Masato Tsutsui, M.D., Ph.D., lead researcher and cardiologist and professor in the pharmacology department at the University of the Ryukyus in Okinawa, Japan.

The study adds to a growing body of research about coffee, the most widely consumed beverage worldwide. Previous studies showed that drinking coffee is linked to lower risks of dying from heart disease and stroke, and that high doses of caffeine may improve the function of larger arteries, reports the Science Daily.
Opinion poll: Harshvardhan emerges as the favourite CM candidate

Opinion poll: BJP may win Delhi polls


According to a poll conducted by ORG for Headlines Today, New Delhi may see a change in the government in the name of BJP's CM candidate Dr Harshvardhan. The poll results show that 38 per cent of the people voted in favour of BJP, while 28 per cent voted in favour of Congress and 26 per cent voted in favour of the Aam Aadmi Party. According to the opinion polls Harshvardhan emerged as the favourite CM candidate. However Delhi Chief Minister Sheila Dikshit had a slight edge over the latest entrant Arvind Kejriwal. The vote share according to the opinion poll revealed a vote share of 29 per cent for Congress, 37 per cent for BJP and 21 per cent for the AAP. Opinion poll: Harshvardhan emerges as the favourite CM candidate Though Kejriwal's party managed to captivate Delhites attention with their corruption-free image, many people questioned the AAP's political set up and their foundation. The party suffered a massive setback recently when a sting operation emerged showing a few AAP members accepting donations without following any proper procedures. Amongst this the biggest problem faced by the people was price rise in the capital, followed by corruption and power tariff. According to the debates and discussion on Headlines Today, the Congress' popularity has taken a back seat due to many issues mainly, the party's incumbent performance at the Centre. The opinion poll also revealed that the BJP is likely to win 40 seat, Congress will manage 18 seats and the AAP with manage to win 10 seats in the December 4 elections.

Recalling the Kanchi Sankaracharya Case

When the Principal Sessions Court in Pondicherry on Wednesday (November 27) acquitted the Kanchi Sankaracharyas, Jayendra Saraswathi and Vijayendra Saraswathi, and all the others charged with the murder of Sankararaman, my mind recalled the arrest of the Sankaracharya in November 2004 and the unprecedented vicious atmosphere created by the Dravidian ideologues and parties, secular media and even liberal intellectuals against the Acharya. They sat upon the Kanchi Mutt, held the Acharya guilty and more and spread all kinds of unmentionable canards about him and the Mutt and hurt beyond words the millions of peaceful spiritual followers of the Mutt, who cried in silence with no one to console them.
No debate on the Sankaracharya judgment will be complete without recalling the vicious and hurtful discourse against the Acharya and the Mutt and how the ancient institution and its faithful underwent the all round assault and pain silently. When the entire spectrum of secular, human rights and liberal megaphones had turned against the Mutt and the Acharya and desecrated them, it was only The New Indian Expresswhich stood for what it believed was right-- namely that the Mutt and the Acharya were being hounded without basis and the case itself was groundless. The judicial verdict exonerating the Acharyas and all the others charged with the crime implies that the entire case was misdirected.
Kanchi Sankaracharya Jayendra Saraswathi leaves a court in Puducherry after being acquitted in the sensational Sankararaman murder case. (PTI)
But, based on counter investigation, The New Indian Express said so within days of the arrest of the Acharya. “The Case Is Dead. Who Will Do The Funeral And When?” This was the title of third of the five articles on the Sankaracharya case that appeared in The New Indian Express. This article appeared on November 24, 2004, exactly 12 days after the seer’s arrest on the auspicious Deepavali day. The article opened thus: “On counter investigation, we found the case against the Sankaracharya not just slippery, but actually groundless from day one. Not just that. It involves a bit of fabrication too. Yes the fabrication to fix the Acharya. The police are running for cover. They may not give up yet and may fabricate more to put the case which is dead on life support system. But the case is irretrievably lost.”
The dramatic turn came on Wednesday in the Kancheepuram Magistrate court. The two criminals on whom the police had exclusively relied to name the Sankaracharya as an accused in the case have actually turned to accuse the police as the fabricators of the case itself. The court judgment now pretty much says the same thing. The New Indian Express carried four more articles in my name on the Sankaracharya case. The first article titled “As the Sankaracharya stands like Abhimanyu” [NIE 23.11.2004] captured the Dravidian political and secular media theatre in the state which were hounding the hapless Acharya stung and stunned by the heinous charge against him.
The Acharya was damaged more by the false news items planted by the police which the willing secular media and Dravidian megaphones lapped up to defame and discredit the Acharya. Another article titled “Unless the Case is Reinvestigated, Justice will not be Done” [26.11.2004] detailed how on the procured testimonies of hardened criminals the state was telling the judiciary that the Sankaracharya was “the worst criminal”. The fourth article dated 3.12.2004 was on how the case had ceased to be an investigation into a crime and had become a vicious campaign to demolish the Acharya himself. The article ended thus: “Even if, at the end, I am entirely proved wrong, I cannot shirk my duty to alert the public and sensitise the authorities about the destruction of too many values involved in this investigation which is gradually turning into a battle between the silent and silenced Kanchi Mutt on the one hand and police and its associate, the media megaphones on the other. It is no more an investigation into crime....it is now a larger design to defame and discredit the Mutt itself.” The final article titled “Will the Secular Media Heed Justice Reddy’s Warning?” appeared on January 14, 2005. This article was on the judgment of Justice Narasimha Reddy of the Andhra Pradesh High Court before whom a frivolous writ had been filed by some labour union on the basis of media reports linking some deaths [which had taken place six years ago on the premises of a mill, from where the Acharya had been arrested] to the Acharya.
Disposing of the writ, the judge said the petitioner swayed by the media did not want to lag behind in the unprecedented process of denigration of the Kanchi Mutt, an ancient, prestigious and glorious institution with almost a 2,500-year history. He added that it was sad that an institution of such glory was targeted and persecuted in an organised manner in an independent country, by “not only individuals, but also a section of the institutions, such as the State and the Press”. He also noted that the proponents of human rights, fair play and dignity to individuals and institutions have maintained stoic silence, adding “a powerful section is celebrating or watching it with indifference” the “perfidy against the Mutt” that had shocked the nation and beyond”. He noted that the “amount of disrepute and sacrilege inflicted on Sri Jayendra Saraswathi has no comparables adding that harshest possible words were used directly or in innuendo against him” and “today he is subjected to similar treatment as was Draupati in the Court of Kauravas”. That was the state of the Acharya and the Mutt when The New Indian Express stood for truth against tsunami of vicious campaign against the Acharya.
The reward for these articles was an arrest warrant against me and almost a search on The New Indian Express and even the Thuglak magazine, which had carried the Tamil version of the articles. As usual the judiciary came to the rescue and passed orders restraining the state. I was questioned by the Superintendent of Police who led the investigation. When I asked him why he was suspecting the Acharya to be the offender, he said that the victim had been sending highly offensive letters to the Acharya and therefore he had a motive to eliminate him. I asked him whether he thought of the possibility of someone inimical to the Acharya eliminating the victim to put the blame on the Acharya. He was blank. I told him that the criminal investigation has to exhaust all the possibilities before opting for one particular view. That is precisely what the police in the Sankaracharya case failed and neglected to do. The result was a huge and costly lapse -- and great hurt to a noble institution and to its silent and peaceful faithfuls. The Sankaracharya case verdict is a lesson for all-- the police, state, media and the liberals --every one of them sided with the police and against the Acharya. Will they now introspect?

Why Tarun Tejpal and Tehelka Should be Downright Ashamed!

by Sonal Bhadoria , IndiaTimes | November 21, 2013, 3:41 pm IST
What are the excuses now?  The December 16th gang-rape rushed into national consciousness because the victim could have been ‘anyone of us’. The gang-rape of a photo journalist in Mumbai shocked because it put a big dent in Mumbai’s image for being safe for women. But the common thread between these two ghastly stories was-the men were from the lower strata of society-less educated, with ad-hoc jobs and the perfect definition of an anti-social element.

Sexual Assault


But as this sensational story broke out, which described how a reputed journalist-Tarun Tejpal of Tehelka had molested a woman journalist who was his daughter’s friend and the daughter of an ex-colleague, we have to come to terms with the fact that erudite, “educated” and these so called “respectable” men are more or less same as the animals who committed the above mentioned heinous crimes. Agreed, it is plain stupid to even attempt to compare these unrelated but ghastly events, but  men can no longer blame it on education, society and other unrelated factors, because one of their kind has just shamed the whole kind.

So what really happened? A woman editor of Tehelka was molested by editor-in-chief Tarun Tejpal during Tehelka's Think festival that was held in Goa from November 08 to 10.

Without going into tawdry details, what has been learnt that Tejpal molested the journalist on not one, but two separate occasions. As we had mentioned, the journalist was not only the daughter of Tejpal’s ex-colleague, but his daughter’s good friend too. After the first incident, Tejpal is said to have told the distraught victim, who had resisted his assault and was walking off, that this was the easiest way for her to keep the job. He attempted to assault her again the next day.
Tarun Tejpal


The victim claims to have received several SMSes from Tejpal, who tried to brush it off as a small incident. She had informed her friend-Tejpal’s daughter and 3 others of the incident and then proceeded to write an email to Tehelka’s managing editor Shoma Chaudhury reporting the incident and calling for action against Tejpal.She also demanded action under the Supreme Court of India's Vishaka Judgement guidelines regarding sexual harassment.

Firstly, let us take a moment to salute the victim who had the courage to speak up against her boss and a well known journalist, being fully aware her identity may become public and her career as a journalist maybe put on the line. The victim’s decision to stay silent on such occasions has been lamented by many as the main reason for emboldening men in power-such as Tejpal, who get great male ego boost everytime a victim chooses to stay silent, giving them a false sense of bravado to take on their next target.

Secondly, Tejpal’s response to the whole incident has been nothing but pathetic. In an email to the magazine's managing editor Shoma Chaudhury he wrote: "The last few days have been most testing, and I squarely take the blame for this. A bad lapse of judgment, an awful misreading of the situation, have led to an unfortunate incident that rails against all we believe in and fight for. I have already unconditionally apologized for my misconduct to the concerned journalist, but I feel impelled to atone further. I feel atonement cannot be just words. I must do the penance that lacerates me. I am therefore offering to recuse myself from the editorship of Tehelka, and from the Tehelka office, for the next six months."

The fact that he was willing to put his reputation, his career and his name on the line for a carnal urge is one end of the stupidity spectrum for Tejpal. But his assumption that this high brow apology, featuring fancy words can make up for his lewd actions just acts as a reminder of his big ego.  The incident, which may have scarred a girl for life, leave alone destroy her trust , has been described as a mere bad lapse of judgment, an awful misreading of the situation, clearly showing he STILL doesn’t think it was a big deal. And he means to show that his “unconditional apology” is although enough, he still feels impelled to atone further. He feels lacerated and for that he must do penance. All hail Tarun Tejpal, apparently the latest reincarnation of Jesus Christ.

And how guilty does he feel, Mr Tejpal seems to have scientifically calculated. Just enough to let go of his position for 6 months. Ah, just enough for the girl to recover, is it Mr. Tejpal? He may have built a career out of exposing our corrupt politicians through sting operations, but his exposed misogynistic self is the perhaps the most ugly of the lot.

More shocking has been the weak reaction of managing editor Shoma Chaudhury, whose actions seem to convey she has sided with the tormentor instead of the victim. “There has been an untoward incident and though he has extended an unconditional apology to the colleague involved, Tarun will be recusing himself as the editor of Tehelka for the next six months,” Chaudhary wrote in a mail to her colleagues.

Chaudhury told The Indian Express that the woman journalist had not filed a criminal complaint and that she, as well as other staffers, were “satisfied with the action taken”.Tehelka has said that the magazine has not instituted an enquiry into the matter. “It is an internal problem and we are not setting up any enquiry into the matter,” Chaudhary told Business Standard.

Given the fact the victim had mailed her in expecting some stern action and in the hope she, being a woman, would understand her pain, Shoma Chaudhury’s response has been disappointing.

Powerful men who think they can have their way always are the big problem here. And a Tarun Tejpal, who is going to cool off somewhere for 6 months before resuming work that involves writing scathing articles and exposes about corrupt politicians and the sad state of affairs in India, is one of them. But just an advice, we hope next time his magazine writes about rape or women safety in India, they do a double check. Hypocrisy can be as bad as a typo.

Nov 22, 2013

Tehelka case: Who is Urvashi Butalia?

Now that the committee is formed and the lead investigator chosen for investigating the plight of the young journalist, many of us would be interested to know who Urvashi Butalia is? and how does she qualify as an investigator to a case that is so important for working women and most of all the nation. Among literary circles and feminists, she is a brand-a name that epitomizes women's rights and revolutionary ideas. Her voice can be heard through her much acclaimed book 'The Other Side of Silence'. But read more to know more about her. 

Birth:Born in Ambala, Haryana, in 1952, she did her B.A in literature from Miranda House and Masters from Delhi University in 1973. IN 1977, she persued Masters in South Asian Studies from the University of London. A feminist, an activist and a thinker She started her career as an Editor in Oxford University Press in Delhi and later at the Oxford headquarters. She worked for Zed Books, a London-based publishing house, and later came back to India to open her own publishing houses Kali for Women (1984) and Zubaan Books (2003). That was the beginning of her career as a feminist as she started developing an idea of women's issues, especially related to partition history and communal riots. Gender, communalism, fundamentalism are some of her other subjects. 'The Other Side of Silence' A literary gateway to the plight of women during partition and their, sometimes brutal,experiences. The book is a conglomeration of over 70 interviews of women who survived the partition, emphasises particularly on the violence against women at the time of crisis. The times have changed, but the position of women remains the same. They continue to be violated to appease egoes, although in different scenarios that are changing with the times. Here's Urvashi again to let justice rest.
Full text of Tehelka emails: 

Tejpal called it an unfortunate incident

Following is the full text of the email purported to have been written by Tehelka Managing Editor Shoma Chaudhary to employees, announcing Tejpal’s decision to “recuse” himself from editorship for six months. Please note that the text of the email was not officially released by Tehelka. 

Dear All, 
This may come as a rude surprise to many of you. There is a letter from Tarun appended to this mail. There has been an untoward incident, and though he has extended an unconditional apology to the colleague involved, Tarun will be recusing himself as the editor of Tehelka for the next six months. Tarun Tejpal. AFP Tehelka is an institution he has built, and which many journalists both current and former, have contributed to in the most profound ways. Throughout our 13-year career, we have proudly articulated and tried to live by the highest standards. We have also believed that when there is a mistake or lapse of any kind, one can only respond with right thought and action. In keeping with this stated principle, and the collective values we live by, Tarun will be stepping down for the period mentioned. This is a hard time for all of us, and I hope all of you will stand by the institution. 
Best, 
shoma

 Following is the full text of the email purported to have been written by Tejpal to managing editor Shoma Chaudhary. The email was not officially released by Tehelka. 

My dear Shoma, 
The last few days have been most testing, and I squarely take the blame for this. A bad lapse of judgment, an awful misreading of the situation, have led to an unfortunate incident that rails against all we believe in and fight for. I have already unconditionally apologised for my misconduct to the concerned journalist, but I feel impelled to atone further. Tehelka has been born and built, day on day, with my blood, toil, tears and sweat, and that of many others, against near-insurmountable odds. It has lived for and fought the big battles of our time, always on the side of the oppressed and the wronged, always on the side of equity and justice. Its voice has travelled the world and changed policy and perceptions. It has been a beacon for those who would do the right thing. Through bad, and worse, times I have protected Tehelka and its journalists from the inevitable demands of power and corporations. I have always allowed every journalist’s sense of the right to flower and express itself. No one has ever been asked to do what they don’t believe in. I have always held that Tehelka the institution, and its work, have always been infinitely more important than any of us individuals. It is tragic, therefore, that in a lapse of judgment I have hurt our own high principles. Because it involves Tehelka, and a sterling shared legacy, I feel atonement cannot be just words. I must do the penance that lacerates me. I am therefore offering to recuse myself from the editorship of Tehelka, and from the Tehelka office, for the next six months. You have always been stellar, Shoma, and even as I apologise to you and all my other colleagues, for this unfortunate incident, I leave Tehelka in your more than capable and safe hands. 
In apology, 
Tarun

Tehelka editor Tarun Tejpal steps aside after sexual assault charges

Tarun Tejpal, founder and editor-in-chief of the weekly magazine Tehelka stepped down from the post for six months following the allegations of sexual assault and intimidation from a junior woman colleague. In an email to the magazine’s managing editor Shoma Chaudhury, Tejpal wrote, “The last few days have been most testing, and I squarely take the blame for this. A bad lapse of judgment, an awful misreading of the situation, have led to an unfortunate incident that rails against all we believe in and fight for.”

Sep 30, 2013

 Without any malice to Christians, Muslims, Jews, etc. It may be little lengthy, but do read till the end. You too may find this interesting.
 Why should a GOD be so INSECURE?
A conversation between an Indian and a Swedish national at an International Airport. 
“So…you are from India…are you a Hindi?” he asked, while having coffee with me.
“Hindi is our national language. You mean to ask am I a Hindu?”
“Yes – I mean religion…”
“Yes. I am a Hindu by birth”
“Do you have Christianity there?”
“Yes, of course. Christianity came to India, centuries before it reached you in Europe” I said.
“Oh, really? Still you are a Hindu?” he asked again.
“Yes – why?” I was curious.
“Don’t tell me you worship monkeys and rats…” he said with a smile.
“As a matter of fact, yes, we do”
“You can’t be serious. You look like an educated person…”
“I am very serious and I worship monkey-god and an elephant-god…what’s that to do with education?” I said.
“You must be joking….People were worshipping animals and trees during pre-historic times…but today's educated people, no way!”
“In fact, we have a pantheon of many gods and we can worship god in any forms…”
“Hey, come on….there is only one GOD” he said.
“Really? I am not sure about it…”
“There is only one GOD…a singular GOD…”
“Better say, you have the concept of a single god…that’s your belief…”
“Concept? Belief…I am telling you the truth…”
“Who said so…?”
“All religious scriptures and sacred books say so… Christianity and Judaism say there is only one God. Islam also says so…”
“Those are great religions…what they say must be true. I don’t know about it… I am not a scholar in Semitic religions or in Hinduism. So let’s don’t talk about the Holy books and religions…I am not capable to discuss it….But about GOD, I have a question.”
“Yes – of course…”
“Ok… you shouldn’t feel angry…I didn’t feel angry when you ridiculed my gods…My question is based on your opinion of single god concept…” I reminded him.
“Shoot”
“You say that there is only one god – single god, right?
“That’s right”
“Your single God claims that he is the only God, who demands that you should worship only him, failing which he would roast you in hell fire…”
“It is not fully correct…but continue…I am listening…”
“That means. You are following Monotheism – that is the belief in a single god. Monotheism insists that only a single God exists. Other gods are “false” or even demonic…”
“Yes- you can say that…”
“For me, it is difficult to accept…”
“Why?”
“If a God says: “You will worship none but me, that you will associate none with me, and that none of you shall set up mortals as deities besides me. If you commit the foulest sin by worshiping any other Gods (other than me) or associating partner with me, I shall throw you in hell fire as a punishment for this sin.” – That’s what, in a nutshell, your GOD says right?”
“What’s wrong in saying that? You need to have faith in Him”
“Friend, isn’t this self-contradictory and dangerous?”
“How come?”
“First, explain to me about the contradictions…Had there been really only one God, it would not have been possible for man to find another God to worship, right?”
“Hmm…”
“Had the God been confident that there is no other God except him, he should not have been jealous of another God, right?”
“Yes – but who is jealous here?”
“Think…If the GOD knew that there is no other God, he would have been confident that people will not find any another God to worship, right?”
“These are all mis-interpretations….that’s not just right…” his voice became bit feeble.
“Think without being biased, without conditionings…think with clarity….”
The behavioral pattern of any single GOD in such concepts suggests that he is not confident that he is the only God. He seems always to be suspicious that there may be other Gods and people may worship those Gods instead of him.
- So the insecure GOD warns man not to worship another God. It, of course, is not a real god’s message. Can’t you clearly see the insecurity and whims and fancy of a narrow-minded human being behind this message?
- Can any GOD always feel threatened that a member of his followers’ gang may slip out of his grip and start to worship another God (probably the real creator of the universe)? So he had to enforce strict law that if any one of his gang tries to desert Him, he should immediately be put to death for apostasy.
- How can any GOD be so insecure? The single insecure god theory converts the basic instinct to insecurity right from the childhood. The follower’s behavior may be fostered by GOD’s violent teachings for establishing Himself as the sole proprietary God of the world.
- And one more thing – you say, your singular god does everything. If there is only one powerful god who controls everything, doesn’t that also mean he creates bad things and causes bad things to happen?
“Do these reflections make any sense? Should I believe such a story or such a GOD?”
“You are talking non-sense, ridiculous…” his face turned red.
“Sir, I told you – why do you feel angry and insecure when I talk about your concept of god? We are having a dialogue here…”
“Shouldn’t I defend my beliefs?” he asked angrily.
“Now you are saying those are just your beliefs…”
“Sorry…Truths…”
“You may. But why should a human try to protect GOD? Why should you feel so insecure if somebody criticizes your concept of God? Isn’t it insecurity?”
“You won’t feel hurt when somebody criticizes your beliefs? You people worship cows…even dogs…are you not ashamed of it…”
“Do I look hurt? But fanatic followers – even in Hinduism – will get angry and violent. I am not fanatic or fundamentalist…I am a humanist…”
“Ok…ok…so you say defending the GOD shows insecurity?”
“One may feel insecure when somebody questions his beliefs. If somebody questions truth, why should you feel insecure? It's truth after all…Should you defend the existence of sun? Your defending won’t change anything with sun…Don’t you think that fanatic god theory is the very root of insecurity – that is why we see a lot of followers have aggression and blind faith. We can find the seed of the real insecurity when a GOD is not confident that he is the only God in the world (and not in the universe)….”
“Your god doesn’t ask you to fear Him”
“No…Never…There are two things. One -The concept or notion of a personal God, hiding behind the clouds of secrecy, telling us irrational stories through few men whom he sends as divine messengers time-to-time, demanding us to worship him or punish us, does not make any sense to me.”
“What’s the second thing?”
“Is God a silly autocratic emperor who wants others to respect him or fear him? Can God stoop to such a low level of narrow-minded like a jealous human being? Or is it those human beings created such God?”
“So you don’t fear GOD…”
“I am afraid, I don’t…”
- The Monotheistic God is jealous and wrathful. There is one God, and one correct method of worship. Those who deviate are heretics and may be punished, tortured or killed. In its exclusive devotion to the worship of one God, monotheism has inspired much ferocity and fanaticism…. that’s how fear comes in.
- At the heart of monotheism is the sure conviction that only a single god exists, a tendency to regard one’s own rituals and practices as the only proper way to worship the one true god.
- When one starts with the presumption that one is absolutely and utterly “right” and anyone thinking otherwise is just as completely “wrong”, it does not promote the flexible thinking required to keep pace with the rapidly fluctuating pace of modern civilized society.
-Monotheism “demands” a right/wrong, heaven/hell, black/white worldview.
-On the contrary, Polytheism is an open-ended and easy going approach to religious beliefs and practices, a willingness to entertain the idea that there are many gods and many ways to worship them. Many roads lead to the mountain top. A person may choose any path.
- Polytheism accepts that there can be more than “one true way”. This allows for more rational thinking when discussing things like belief system.
Hence, polytheism is more compatible with a naturalistic view of the universe than monotheism.
“Ok…I understand your view points, though I don’t agree with you… But you didn’t answer my question. What do your gods say about worshipping them and fearing them?”
“Very simple. An Indian saint, Adi Sankara said: “Aakashat patitam toyam, Yadha gachhati saagaram, Sarva deva namaskara: Keshavam prati gachhati!!”
“What- what’s that? Come again?”
“It is in Sanskrit. It means: Just as every rain drop that falls from the sky flows into the Ocean, in the same way every prayer offered to any Deity flows to the divine cosmic power (Kesava).”
“Oh…”
- “In short, you may worship or believe in any God. No problem…Even if you don’t worship or don’t believe, still it is no problem…. This message from the GOD is so confident, so secure, secular and broad-minded. Because it can only come from the true creator of the universe, if at all there is a creator. And you are not asked to protect this GOD and resort to violence.”
“Ah..That’s why you don’t get angry?”
“Yes – You don’t have to spread the message of this God. You don’t have to defend the God. If somebody says badly about this God, I don’t have to get angry or fight for this God. A true Hindu believes that God protects us; we don’t have to protect God. So a true Hindu cannot get hurt in the name of God or religion….”
“So your religion is against single and personal god”
“Not like that… You can worship personal god or impersonal god…everything is manifestation of the same cosmic divinity…so no problem…you have freedom there too…You don’t have to market this God and convert others into his fold and increase market share. That’s why I remain as Hindu. How can you believe in concepts of any other insecure Gods?”
“OK, you made your point clear. But why do you worship monkeys, cows and elephants?”
“An ancient scripture says: “Isavasyam idam sarvam” (Isopanisad) …Everything animate or inanimate that is within the universe is Divine. This entire manifest Universe is enveloped by the Divine, the cosmic power…. Hence you can see God in everything – the monkey, donkey, rat, and elephant or even in protozoa….”
“That means you can worship anything in this universe?”
“Yes – Be it Sun or Moon, Be it Hanuman or Ganapathi – whoever you worship, you are worshipping the cosmic power. My favorite God is Hanuman (Monkey-God). My traditional village God is Narasimha (Lion-God)….”
“Don’t you feel awkward? Shameful?”
“Why should I? I am not ashamed or apologetic to admit it….Nobody forced me to worship or believe in them. I had a choice there. I am in a democratic country. Nobody told me that this God would roast me in the hell, if I don’t worship it. I just love the stories of Hanuman and Narasimha. And I am free to criticize or make fun of those stories….”
“But, the animal gods are not scientific… So ancient tribes considered everything as GOD…There is no science in it…”
“On the contrary, there was scientific advancement among our ancestors…While my ancestors were learning and teaching the secrets of life and universe, the homo sapiens of the West were still crawling on all fours and living in the caves….”
- While my ancestors were calculating the exact distance to the minutest details, between the earth and sun or teaching Vedic mathematics and astronomy, the West was believing the earth is flat till a couple of hundred years ago.
- Should I challenge my ancestors and convert my belief to the extent that Coca Cola is better than natural honey?
No – I don’t need a certificate or empirical scientific proof approved by any international scientific body to understand the presence of God in monkeys and lions. At least monkeys are our ancestors and lions are the kings in the forest. It is anyways better than worshiping an insecure GOD. And I don’t expect monkey or lion to show any magic and miracle to prove that they represent divine energy…
Every God - everything in the universe- is a manifestation of the divine power.
And the Hindu scripture neither demands you to worship the GOD nor will a Hindu be roasted in hell. Even if you don’t worship GOD, nothing can change – because your karma decides your destiny- the God has little or no role in it – The Gita too assures this.
- “I hope this answer to your question – why do I continue to be a Hindu? I follow “THIS” Hinduism; hence I cannot be a fundamentalist or fanatic….”
“Hmm…Somewhat…but don’t say that you are right and I am wrong…”
- “I don’t. What’s more, let me admit – the entry level Hinduism has some mal-practices and superstitions without any scientific base. (Read up-to-date science. tomorrow this can change). Most of the people blindly follow lot of tradition without understanding its true meanings or relevance. Some of those practices are either unessential or irrelevant in today’s life….”
“That’s true in all religions…”
- “In all other religions you can see the follower has learned everything about his/her religion and can beautifully explain all aspects his/her religion. An ordinary Hindu doesn’t know or learn about his religion. The Gita is read by less than one percent of the Hindu population. That’s the problem with a Hindu….”
“You told me about worshipping trees…And why do Hindus worship trees?”
“Hinduism has always been an environmentally sensitive philosophy. It is a totally green religion. Our ancestors were not very much interested in automobiles, petroleum products and plastics. What pollutes the earth? What causes cancer? A cow or an automobile?”
- God exists in everything. The trees are held in a special esteem in Hinduism as they provide food, oxygen, shelter, etc. By associating religion with plant kingdom, our ancient Indians tried to instill in us a reverence for them, so that we may protect, preserve and cultivate these beneficial plants in the future.
- Plant kingdom gives me everything I that I need – so what’s wrong in worshiping it? Worshiping a tree is better than worshiping an imaginary God, isn’t it?
“OK – but I have a genuine question now…If you don’t have a personal God, how will you pray? What will you pray? What will you ask for?”
“Should we pray? What should I pray?” When we know that isavasyam idam sarvam, what’s there to pray? I am part of GOD and the GOD is part of me. I cannot exist without GOD and GOD cannot exist without me.
* Aham Brahmasmi (Brhadaranyaka Upanishad) = “I am Brahman” I am integral part of cosmic energy.
* Tat Tvam Asi (Chandogya Upanishad) = “Thou art That” The identity of individual self as a part of the whole which is ‘tat’, Brahman.
* Ayam Atma Brahma (Mandukya Upanishad) = “This Self (Atman) is Brahman”
* prajñānam brahma – “Consciousness is Brahman” (Aitareya Upanishad 3.3 of the Rig Veda).
“As everything in the universe belong to me, what else I need? What would anybody gain by a prayer? God has provided me everything I need (not what I WANT)”
“That means you don’t need anything?”
“If I answer philosophically, I need something, only if it is lacking in me. Nothing lacks in me. I don’t feel I am imperfect or anyways inferior to anybody. Because, I am created by a perfect divinity. It just can’t go wrong.”
- There is a divine assurance for this:”Om Poorna Madah Poorna Midam Poornaat Poorna Mudachayate Poornasya Poorna Maadaaya Poorna Mevaa Vashishyate” (That is perfect; this is perfect. What comes from such Perfection truly is perfect. What remains after Perfection from Perfection is yet again perfect)
- The cosmic created me just as it created you. So nobody can be imperfect. At least accept this truth: “I am perfect with all my imperfections”
– I don’t have to pray for anything as the force behind creation has seen to it so perfectly that everything is perfectly managed for me. For instance, before I was born, the cosmic has in-stored my food as my mother’s milk – who can take care of better than this? Everything is being taken care, so meticulously – so what should I pray.
- Whatever I need will be given to me by the divine. Am I a fool to think that even a grass can move without the cosmic knowledge? No, I don’t have to remind the cosmic what I need. It knows better what I need. Any situation in life appears with cosmic wisdom – who am I to question it or challenge it or pray against such a situation?
“You mean to say you don’t have prayers?”
- “We do have…. my ancestors taught me three most important and non-personalized prayers”
1. “Asatoma Ma Sadgamaya tamaso ma jyotirgamaya mrtyorma amrtam gamaya Om santhi, santhi santhihi” (Brhadaranyaka Upanishad). Take us from darkness to light’; from ignorance to awareness; from incompleteness to totality. Let there be peace everywhere. This is not a personal prayer.
2.”Loka samastha sukhino bhavanthu.” May happiness be unto the entire world. Not just me. I should not pray for any selfish gain, my ancestors taught me. If your neighbor is starving and I am binging, where is the happiness? The entire world should be happy.
3. “Om Bhur Buvaha Suvaha Thath Savithur VarenyamBhargo Devasya Dheemahi Dhiyo Yonaha Prachodayath” (Gayatri). We contemplate the glory of Light illuminating the three worlds: gross, subtle, and causal. I am that vivifying power, love, radiant illumination, and divine grace of universal intelligence. We pray for the divine light to illumine our minds.